This rifle has a 42" rifled .40 cal. full oct bbl with 7 groove rifling that is signed in script by John Amos. This is an outstanding Bedford school Kentucky rifle. John Amos (1800 – 1867) was married to the sister of the gunsmith William Border. The last year Amos was taxed as a gunsmith was 1844. The 4-pc engraved brass patch box has six piercings and is similar to the Amos rifle pictured on page 45 of Whisker’s book “Gunsmiths of Bedford, Somerset and Fulton Counties”. The silver wrist inlays, relief carving with silver inlay rear of the cheek piece and silver cheek inlay above a silver half-moon inlay are also similar to the rifle pictured in Whisker’s book. The brass side plate with its two piercings is like the Amos rifle on page 44 of Whisker’s book. There are 2-3/4" silver inlays inlet on each side of the rifle forward of the lock. There are several incised carved interrupted relief panels along each side of the fore stock. This is most definitely a rifle for the collector who wants one of Bedford’s best. In his book “The Bedford County Rifle and its Makers” originally published in 1959 as an addition to J.G.W. Dillin’s book “The Kentucky Rifle”, Calvin Hetrick notes “John Amos was a gunsmith of considerable skill”. His plate number 138 features an Amos rifle Mr. Hetrick considered “the best work of John Amos, one of the top rank Bedford County Makers”. CONDITION: Excellent. There is a minor glue line and crack visible on the lock side of the fore stock toward the muzzle and a very small circular crack at the toe of the lock and the tang. A very small bit of silver inlay is missing from the nose pipe decoration. Other than these rather insignificant items, there is really nothing to detract from the quality and beauty of this great Bedford rifle.
Copy and photos supplied byJames D. Julia, Inc. This item will be in their March 12 & 13, 2012 auction.
When Robert Weil started collecting images for the Contemporary Makers book in 1973 the challenge to record contemporary gun work was daunting. Gathering material was difficult and time consuming. Few makers thought that there was any value in published documentation of their work. Electronic publishing has changed all that. Having a website or having one's work available to view on the internet is becoming a necessity. In spite of all the potential to finally have a true overview of what's being produced by the artists of today, a great deal of work still remains covered up and basically unknown. Our role is to make an effort to document some portion of what’s going on today. To comment on the established makers and to uncover the unknown. We welcome your comments and suggestions and look to you our readers to make us aware of the talented makers out there. Art and Jan Riser Robert Weil and The Makers