In overall very good+,
condition. The round, pin-fastened, 45 1/2", sighted, .78+ caliber, iron
and smoothbore barrel with a baluster-turned breech. A fine touch-hole and bore
with evidence of expected use. The lock with smooth steel-gray surfaces, a
single bridle-screw, behind the original gooseneck hammer and an early form,
trefoil-finial frizzen spring. Marked on the tail of the lockplate with the
vestige of an effaced date/George I Royal Cypher marking. Banana form, rounded,
lockplate with a bridle-less powder-pan. Molded and finely carved, early
Longland Pattern, walnut fullstock with a raised-carved beaver-tail apron, around
the barrel tang, a pronounced raised lobe on the handrail-- at the ramrod entry
pipe and a well-defined comb, on the buttstock. The sideplate and lockplate
mortises with finely relief carved teardrop borders. Early Regulation Longland
type full brass hardware: the buttplate with a long, screw-fastened, 3-stepped
tang, the trigger-guard with an early trefoil type forward finial and a fluted
bow, a raised sideplate with a tail, two (2) iron sidebolts, a Shield-type
wrist-escutcheon and its four (4) baluster-turned ramrod pipes (for the
original? wooden rammer). Of early Regulation Pattern design, ca. 1720. In
overall very good+, well-used, original flintlock condition. The lock and
barrel with smooth, evenly toned, untouched, iron surfaces and patches of discoloration,
light staining and the expected signs of use and wear: a very good bore. In
mechanically functional order with a strong mainspring, fine timing and its
original lock components. Very good stock with signs of extended military use.
Retains 75%+ finish with scattered handling marks, light abrasions, minor old
forestock repairs/tight hairlines. The brass furniture with an untouched,
smooth, mustard toned age-patina. A Very Seldom Seen & Early Regulation
Longland Pattern Musket, ca. 1720-1728. Both sling-swivels removed. Overall
length, 60". ****For similar examples and additional information, please
see H. L. Blackmore’s: “British Military Firearms 1650-1850”, pg. 74-75 &
G. C. Neumann’s: “Battle Weapons of the American Revolution”, pg. 56-57. Recently
acquired from an Old New York Collection.
Copy and photos from Ambrose Antiques.
This isn't a regulation Brown Bess, it is a rather Dutch looking musket - probably a musket purchased by a colonel for his regiment before there was uniformity of armaments in the British Army.
ReplyDelete